writes about his car likes and dislikes, which are decidedly eccentric
I've often wondered about the trends in design and popularity of cars. Maybe you have too. Here are some of my own views about automobiles.
...use Google to search on butt ugly car...1-10/iss42cv.jpg" alt="" />The car pictured at right is my all-time favorite: the French-made Citroën 2CV (deux chevaux = two horsepower!). I call this car the "anti-BMW" because it represents everything that the BMW does not: Style, fuel economy, low maintenance, low initial investment, collector value at resale. It's an economical car that stands out in the crowd where every dot-com Silicon Valley stock-optioned Jack and Jane has gone with the herd mentality with their BMW purchases. Additionally the Deux Chevaux doesn't sport that ugly set of buck teeth the BMW calls a grille.
Strangest Design Decision
Hands down this award belongs to the Nissan Xterra SUV for that ugly blister gracing the Xterra's rear door. The whole bubble ruins the symmetry of an otherwise good-looking vehicle. The blister creates a very strange rear window shape, making one think that the designer was smoking something very interesting. That people actually buy this vehicle with this cosmetic defect is astounding. There must be other saving graces.
If you visit the Nissan Motors website you'll find that they refer to it as a trademark, and the interior makes for a nice "nest" to hold their optional First Aid kit. Wow! What a novel idea! What happens to all that stuff when you raise the door up to open it? I think I'll keep my first aid kit up front in the glove compartment and forgo the added expense of an external blister.
If you use Google to search on "butt ugly car" (and filter out the "butt-ugly martian" stuff) then you'll have a good chance to land on reviews or forums that describe ugly cars. One of the most-mentioned is the Pontiac Aztek -(misspelling names for cars is so cool!). This car was designed with an abominable double grille up front and a very uncool slant on the rear end, a design that looks like a true Aztec warrior took his revenge on Cortez by hacking off the rear top of car. Pontiac had no choice but to put a window in the new opening and try to sell it.
An American Automobile Fault
I have owned foreign autos for several decades now and every time I travel and am forced to rent an American-designed car, I have the same old homesickness for my Japanese workhorses. One reason is the nonsensical custom of requiring the driver to carry two keys rather than one. For the typical American car you need one to open the door and another to insert into the ignition. Yes, I know that you might want to leave your car with a valet but the foreign cars I've owned had a special "valet" key that opened only the door and the ignition but not the trunk or glovebox. Also, General Motors, after 40 years of Japanese and German competition (even Ford and Chrysler have been making double-sided keys for some time), still make keys that can be inserted only one way. Foreign keys can be inserted top up or top down. This makes it so much easier when trying to enter your car after the sun goes down and it's dark outside.
The downside of (American) rental cars
At least with the cars I've rented, the hinge mechanism for the trunk lid actually lowers into the trunk space, making it impossible to put suitcases or packages into that space or you risk crushing them when lowering the lid. What idiot designed a hinge that reduces the storage volume?
Take a look at the images to the right: The top one illustrates the trunk with baggage and lid open. The middle picture shows the trunk lid descending and beginning to smash the suitcase under it with its left hinge. In the bottom photo the lid is nearly closed and the suitcase has been turned on its side to allow the hinge to fit into its space, effectively cutting the luggage volume in that area by 30%.
On the import cars I've driven, this mechanism is neatly tucked out of the way and presents no space-wasting issues.
If you don't believe me when I say that this pile of iron and plastic (I don't want to offend cars by calling it one), check out some other web sites or look on Google. From the San Francisco Weekly : Absolutely one of the best vehicles for . The most important thing you do need to remember, if you do buy this car for that purpose, is you need a fake mustache and beard, oversized dark sunglasses, big cowboy hat and a wig maybe. You ask why? Because if someone you know sees you next to or in this ugly looking car you may be too embarrassed to be recognized and may not want anyone to know you own this vehicle, that's why. The Aztek is butt ugly in my opinion but I don't want anyone to be offended by my thoughts or those of several people that I spoke to about the Aztek.... The Rendezvous' stepchild, the Pontiac Aztec, is a fine example of ugly on rice. The "1950 Studebaker Ugly Car Award" The 1950 Studebaker was ugly...from any angle. There have been a few contenders for "uglier" over the years: the Porsche 914, the 1999 Mercury Cougar, anything made by Citreon. But the 2000 Pontiac Aztec is unquestionably the ugliest thing you will ever see. It is ugly from the front, the back and the sides. General Motors' attempt at stylish boldness makes a red-headed step-child look attractive. Therefore the "‘50 Studebaker Ugly Car Award" goes to the Pontiac Aztec. Another one here: Pontiac Aztek: A Dumpster with headlights that makes a Zamboni seem sexy, the Aztek sets a new standard for aesthetic abuse--even for a minivan. GM tried to be different, and the finished product could not have come out worse had a drunken band of 16-year-olds been given 3 hours with Sawzalls, a few gallons of Bondo, and some kit-car leftovers. Editor's Note August 2010: It has been heard that the Pontiac Aztek is the Zune of automobiles. It might even rank as the Microsoft Kin of cars (on the order of 500 Kins were reportedly sold before it was yanked from the market two months after it was introduced).
|E-mail Print to PDF Blog|